<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Beating Upwind &#187; Cars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beatingupwind.com/category/cars/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beatingupwind.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts of a gay New Yorker living in Upper Manhattan</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NYC DOB Rejects Our Plans For No Good Reason</title>
		<link>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2010-06/nyc-dob-rejects-our-plans-for-no-good-reason</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2010-06/nyc-dob-rejects-our-plans-for-no-good-reason#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Harper</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Construction & Renovation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NYC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[VW]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Harlem Townhouses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingupwind.com/?p=670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, today was plan review day and we got rejected, AGAIN. The reasons this time were just bizarre&#8230;
The first thing that was rejected was the energy review. Our architect did this complex analysis using a web-based program provided by the federal government where you enter all the characteristics of the building including wall types, window [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, today was plan review day and we got rejected, AGAIN. The reasons this time were just bizarre&#8230;</p>
<p>The first thing that was rejected was the energy review. Our architect did this complex analysis using a web-based program provided by the federal government where you enter all the characteristics of the building including wall types, window types, light fixtures, etc. and it confirms compliance with the 2010 standards that are in effect for New York State. But the plan examiner rejected it because NYC is still on <em>2007</em> energy standards and the 2010 standards aren&#8217;t being phased in until later this year. They literally told us to come back in 24 days, on July 1, since they&#8217;ll accept our architect&#8217;s energy analysis on that date. So we got rejected for showing compliance with a <em>more demanding</em> standard that they&#8217;re going to use in less than a month. Go figure.</p>
<p>Second major item was the sprinkler system (again). This time the plan examiner wanted documentation that there was sufficient pressure in the water main to support the sprinklers being on the domestic water supply despite the fact that the code specifically states that sprinkler systems with 30 or fewer  heads can feed off the domestic water supply. He also wanted all the pipe sizes and sprinkler heads specified, but that&#8217;s typically done when the sprinkler system is certified - it doesn&#8217;t need to be done at this point and requiring it now is just being difficult.</p>
<p>The biggest issue that he raised is that he&#8217;s insisting we do a pressure test on the water main to do the calculations to determine the sizes of pipes that are required for the sprinkler system. It takes 4 to 6 weeks to get DEP to do a flow test, so that means we can&#8217;t go in for a plan review until that&#8217;s done. Again, the flow test is typically done after DOB approves the overall plan - he&#8217;s just being obstructionist IMHO.</p>
<p>At one point the plan examiner insisted that we needed 2 hour fire rated walls around the stairwell, not 1 hour walls. Our expediter stuck to his guns and then it took the plan examiner 10 minutes of searching the code to realize we were right and he was wrong. Why do they have people doing plan exams who don&#8217;t know the code? If the code is just horribly complicated then why not have plan examiners specialize in certain building types? If we had someone who really knew the code issues for townhouses then maybe they&#8217;d know the code well enough to do their job properly.</p>
<p>Then the plan examiner was telling our expediter that he saw errors in the &#8220;I-Cards&#8221; for the building. <a href="http://www.nyc.gov/html/hpd/html/about/faqs.shtml#icard" target="_blank">I-Cards were the predecessor to Certificates of Occupancy</a>, which came out in 1938. So in other words, he was holding <em>us</em> responsible for errors previous building owners made dating back to 1938 or before. I mean <em>please</em>&#8230; The whole point of our rehabbing the building is to bring it up to code and get a C of O. How can inaccuracies on the old I-Cards matter when the point of the exercise is to make them obsolete by getting a C of O?</p>
<p>Next time Dan and I will go to the plan review to prove the point that we&#8217;re not some nefarious slumlord trying to build a crappy substandard building. We&#8217;re just regular guys. Plus, with the enormous workload that DOB is under right now I just don&#8217;t understand how it&#8217;s productive for them to keep having us come back over and over again for stupid little things.</p>
<p>Now imagine if we were trying to purchase the place with a rehab loan and needed to get approved plans to close the loan. Obstructions like this can really hamper redevelopment of blighted buildings - for no good reason because they can tank deals. And it&#8217;s the reason why it can take FOREVER to close when the buyer needs financing to purchase. I&#8217;m sure more than a few deals have gone bad because DOB took too long and the contracts expired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2010-06/nyc-dob-rejects-our-plans-for-no-good-reason/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surprisingly High Comp For A Harlem Townhouse Shell</title>
		<link>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2010-04/surprisingly-high-comp-for-a-harlem-townhouse-shell</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2010-04/surprisingly-high-comp-for-a-harlem-townhouse-shell#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 22:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Harper</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NYC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Harlem Townhouses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingupwind.com/?p=568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harlem Bespoke just pointed out that 11 West 119th Street sold recently - for $400,000! That might seem like a low price, but actually it&#8217;s a surprisingly high price. The building is 14&#8242; x 38&#8242; on a shallow 65&#8242; lot. 14&#8242; x 38&#8242; x 4 stories = approx. 2,128 sq. ft. So the cost per [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;source=s_q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=11+W+119th+St,+New+York,+NY+10027&amp;sll=37.0625,-95.677068&amp;sspn=48.641855,89.472656&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;hq=&amp;hnear=11+W+119th+St,+New+York,+10027&amp;ll=40.803516,-73.945582&amp;spn=0,0.00273&amp;z=19&amp;layer=c&amp;cbll=40.802821,-73.945582&amp;panoid=wHp0RstXP0mbCwW8N7SQig&amp;cbp=12,21.26,,0,-15.5" target="_blank"><img class="size-medium wp-image-569 alignright" style="margin: 8px;" title="11 West 119th  Street, Harlem townhouse shell" src="http://www.beatingupwind.com/resources/2010/04/screen-shot-2010-04-07-at-52850-pm-365x375.jpg" alt="11 West 119th Street, Harlem townhouse shell" width="292" height="300" /></a><a href="http://harlembespoke.blogspot.com/2010/04/dwell-11-west-119th-street-sold.html" target="_blank">Harlem Bespoke just pointed out</a> that 11 West 119th Street sold recently - for $400,000! That might seem like a low price, but actually it&#8217;s a surprisingly high price. The building is 14&#8242; x 38&#8242; on a shallow 65&#8242; lot. 14&#8242; x 38&#8242; x 4 stories = approx. 2,128 sq. ft. So the cost per square foot was $188/sq. ft. By contrast we bought <a href="http://www.beatingupwind.com/tag/168-west-123rd-street">ours</a> a few blocks away for $118/sq. ft. If 11 West 119th had sold for our price per square foot the price would have been $250,000. The final asking price was $450K. I&#8217;m not sure why the buyer only got $50K off final asking when most people buying similar properties tend to get $150-200K off asking. (For example, <a href="http://www.beatingupwind.com/2010-03/168-west-123rd-street-is-now-ours">we got $265K off what they were asking</a> when we started bidding).</p>
<p>During our search we went through the one 2 doors down - 7 West 119th Street. It was fully renovated with some high end finishes (Sub Zero fridge, but just &#8220;better than rental&#8221; cabinetry). It wound up selling for $1.0983M. It&#8217;s hard to figure out the square footage of #7. Officially it&#8217;s 2,794 sq. ft. so it officially sold for $393/sq. ft. However, the City has it&#8217;s length at 47&#8242; when all it&#8217;s sibling neighbors are officially 38&#8242;. I don&#8217;t remember it being pushed out in the back and the permit they pulled said no enlargement was proposed. It&#8217;s on a lot with a diagonal back line - one side it&#8217;s 54&#8242; deep, the other it&#8217;s 58&#8242; deep. I remember the back yard basically being a small deck, but it the short side was definitely more than 7&#8242; feet long. So I really think the square footage of #7 is smaller and more inline with it&#8217;s neighbors. On top of everything else they did a double height living room so it was probably under 2,000 of real square feet. If it were 2,000 sq. ft. then the price per square foot would have been $549/sq. ft. which is <a href="http://www.beatingupwind.com/2010-03/upper-end-of-harlem-townhouse-market-is-doing-better">way over what the other comps support</a>. By comparison the incredible one on Strivers&#8217; Row went for $505/sq. ft.</p>
<p>11 West 119th is a SMALL townhouse that shouldn&#8217;t be made into more than a single family home (#7 was made into a 2 family with a tiny studio apartment and I think it was a mistake). It&#8217;s not not in a historic district (though it is literally adjacent to a one). It&#8217;s steps from East Harlem where values are somewhat lower. It&#8217;s across the street from (relatively nice) public housing. So I&#8217;m not seeing how the property commanded $188/sq. ft. But with both #7 and #11 selling way over what the comps support — apparently they&#8217;re smoking <em>really</em> good over at that end of West 119th Street!  <img src='http://www.beatingupwind.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>No matter - this is a great comp for those of us who own townhouses. Be happy! And for the new owners of #7 and #11 West 119th Street - <a href="http://www.beatingupwind.com/2010-03/now-is-a-great-time-to-buy-a-harlem-townhouse">the values will go up in the coming years</a> and they&#8217;ll still make money when they sell.</p>
<p>But honestly - if you&#8217;re looking to buy a Harlem townhouse shell - get a <a href="http://www.williamandstone.com/brokerwebsite3/barak/userview.asp?user=38053" target="_blank">damn good</a> <a href="http://www.williamandstone.com/brokerwebsite3/barak/userview.asp?user=38021" target="_blank">real estate broker</a> and a subscription to <a href="http://www.propertyshark.com/" target="_blank">Property Shark</a> that includes comps and really get to know what things are actually <em>selling</em> for (as opposed to what they&#8217;re listed for). A Property Shark membership is WAY cheaper than overpaying for real estate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2010-04/surprisingly-high-comp-for-a-harlem-townhouse-shell/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harlem Townhouses We&#8217;ve Seen In Our Search</title>
		<link>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2009-11/harlem-townhouses-weve-seen-in-our-search</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2009-11/harlem-townhouses-weve-seen-in-our-search#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Harper</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NYC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Harlem Townhouses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingupwind.com/?p=340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve seen a lot of townhouses in the quest for the place for us to buy. I may have missed a few, but it seems to be 27 and counting - most of which have been in Hamilton Heights / Sugar Hill. We have seen a little in Central Harlem, but have mixed feelings about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve seen a lot of townhouses in the quest for the place for us to buy. I may have missed a few, but it seems to be 27 and counting - most of which have been in Hamilton Heights / Sugar Hill. We have seen a little in Central Harlem, but have mixed feelings about that area. Central Harlem has more and better services, but the area is much more hit-and-miss / block-by-block.</p>
<p>The longer we search the more we see see what really makes places valuable&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li>Being in a large, established, historic district like Hamilton Heights / Sugar Hill</li>
<li>Having a certificate of no harassment, or not needing one at all.</li>
</ul>
<p>If you click on the blue dots you get a quick synopsis of what we thought about each place.</p>
<p><iframe width="550" height="650" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" src="http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&amp;hl=en&amp;msa=0&amp;msid=117922169859090633843.000477792120aa70dc6c3&amp;ll=40.818941,-73.945971&amp;spn=0.042221,0.047207&amp;z=14&amp;output=embed"></iframe><br /><small>View <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&amp;hl=en&amp;msa=0&amp;msid=117922169859090633843.000477792120aa70dc6c3&amp;ll=40.818941,-73.945971&amp;spn=0.042221,0.047207&amp;z=14&amp;source=embed" style="color:#0000FF;text-align:left">Townhouses We&#8217;ve Seen</a> in a larger map</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2009-11/harlem-townhouses-weve-seen-in-our-search/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VW Misses The Mark With the 2010 GTI</title>
		<link>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2009-10/vw-misses-the-mark-with-the-2010-gti</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2009-10/vw-misses-the-mark-with-the-2010-gti#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Harper</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[VW]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[GTI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingupwind.com/?p=327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anyone else see the glaring problem with the ad I got in my e-mail (below)?

It&#8217;s really quite simple&#8230; That car has 4 doors. The &#8220;legend&#8221; of the GTI is that it&#8217;s supposed to be an inexpensive sports car and sports cars just don&#8217;t have 4 doors - they have 2 doors and a good [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else see the glaring problem with the ad I got in my e-mail (below)?</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-328" title="2010 VW GTI advertisement" src="http://www.beatingupwind.com/resources/2009/10/2010-gti.jpg" alt="2010 VW GTI advertisement" width="550" height="300" /><br />
It&#8217;s really quite simple&#8230; That car has 4 doors. The &#8220;legend&#8221; of the GTI is that it&#8217;s supposed to be an inexpensive sports car and sports cars just don&#8217;t have 4 doors - they have 2 doors and a good engine.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not &#8220;the return of a Legend&#8221; - it&#8217;s the return of a huge mistake they&#8217;ve made before - watering down the GTI and making it a Golf/Rabbit with a few extra features. The GTI needs to be distinct from the Golf or else it&#8217;s not a GTI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2009-10/vw-misses-the-mark-with-the-2010-gti/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I like the Mk5 VW GTI better than the Mk6</title>
		<link>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2009-04/mk5-gti-vs</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2009-04/mk5-gti-vs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Harper</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[VW]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[GTI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingupwind.com/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today VW is revealing the look of the Mark 6 Golf line with the Mk6 GTI. Here&#8217;s the pic they sent out yesterday&#8230;

Personally, I don&#8217;t really like it. I mean, it&#8217;s nice enough and better than a lot of their competitors, but I don&#8217;t know that it&#8217;s an improvement over the Mk 5 Golf/GTI/R32&#8230;
Here&#8217;s a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today VW is revealing the look of the Mark 6 Golf line with the Mk6 GTI. Here&#8217;s the pic they sent out yesterday&#8230;</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-124" title="2010 VW GTI Mk6" src="http://www.beatingupwind.com/resources/2009/04/vw_gti_mkvi.jpg" alt="2010 VW GTI Mk6" width="582" height="331" /></p>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t really like it. I mean, it&#8217;s nice enough and better than a lot of their competitors, but I don&#8217;t know that it&#8217;s an improvement over the Mk 5 Golf/GTI/R32&#8230;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a Mk 5 GTI&#8230;</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-127" title="Mk5 VW GTI" src="http://www.beatingupwind.com/resources/2009/04/mk5-gti.jpg" alt="Mk5 VW GTI" width="580" height="347" /></p>
<p>The Mark 5 &#8220;face&#8221; just has more attitude. The Mk 6 looks more pedestrian. The Mk 6 front end would be fine if it were a Golf/Rabbit, but it doesn&#8217;t look sporty. It looks like they&#8217;re watering down the appearance of the GTI, which is never a good idea - that&#8217;s what the Golf/Rabbit is for.</p>
<p>Oh well, it is what it is. I didn&#8217;t like the Mk 5 when I first saw it either, but it grew on me and now I love our Mk 5 R32&#8230; We&#8217;ll see what I think in a year&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2009-04/mk5-gti-vs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t People Die In A Crossfire?</title>
		<link>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2008-11/dont-people-die-in-a-crossfire</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2008-11/dont-people-die-in-a-crossfire#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Harper</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingupwind.com/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve never understood Chrysler&#8217;s deciding to name a car &#8220;Crossfire&#8221;. I mean, don&#8217;t people die in crossfires? How many times have you heard a news story that said &#8220;XX people died in a crossfire today in YY&#8221;&#8230; So why would you name a car after something where people die? I just don&#8217;t get it&#8230;
Nice looking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never understood Chrysler&#8217;s deciding to name a car &#8220;Crossfire&#8221;. I mean, don&#8217;t people die in crossfires? How many times have you heard a news story that said &#8220;XX people died in a crossfire today in YY&#8221;&#8230; So why would you name a car after something where people die? I just don&#8217;t get it&#8230;</p>
<p>Nice looking car though&#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-90" title="Chrysler Crossfire" src="http://www.beatingupwind.com/resources/2008/11/chrysler_crossfire.jpg" alt="Chrysler Crossfire" width="500" height="375" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2008-11/dont-people-die-in-a-crossfire/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I don&#8217;t get straight people sometimes&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2008-09/i-dont-get-straight-people</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2008-09/i-dont-get-straight-people#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Harper</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Girls in bikinis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Honda Odyssey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingupwind.com/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This photo makes no sense on two levels&#8230; 1) Why would someone do that to a minivan? I mean, it&#8217;s a minivan for god&#8217;s sake! And 2) what&#8217;s with the girl in the photo? Is she supposed to be the soccer mom who owns the minivan? Wouldn&#8217;t it be hotter if she drove a different [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This photo makes no sense on two levels&#8230; 1) Why would someone do that to a minivan? I mean, it&#8217;s a <em>minivan</em> for god&#8217;s sake! And 2) what&#8217;s with the girl in the photo? Is she supposed to be the soccer mom who owns the minivan? Wouldn&#8217;t it be hotter if she drove a different type of car?</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-68" title="Bikini model in front of a pimped out minivan" src="http://www.beatingupwind.com/resources/2008/09/minivan-babe.jpg" alt="" width="451" height="319" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Please, if you understand straight people - explain that photo to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2008-09/i-dont-get-straight-people/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1 Year, 10,000 Miles, Loving Our 2008 VW R32</title>
		<link>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2008-09/1-year-10000-miles-loving-our-r32</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2008-09/1-year-10000-miles-loving-our-r32#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Harper</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[VW]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[r32]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingupwind.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I got the R32 a year ago I was really psyched. I had waited like 6 months for it and it was in the first batch to arrive in August &#8216;07&#8230; My only complaint about the car is that I haven&#8217;t gotten to drive it enough - especially this year. I think it was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I got the R32 a year ago I was really psyched. I had waited like 6 months for it and it was in the first batch to arrive in August &#8216;07&#8230; My only complaint about the car is that I haven&#8217;t gotten to drive it enough - especially this year. I think it was July that we put a whopping 30 miles on it.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, we did manage to put about 10,000 miles on it the first year and had a great time with it. Initially I was driving to Norwalk, CT a couple a times a week on the Merritt Parkway, which is a blast with all the curves and whatnot. And on Memorial Day I drove single-handed to Chicago with a stop in Cincinatti both directions.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t gotten enough pictures of it, but here is one from the Chicago trip - this one is taken in Oak Park, near the Frank Lloyd Wright house&#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.beatingupwind.com/resources/2008/09/cw-vw-r32-oak-park-900x600.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-62" title="2008 Mk 5 R32, Candy White" src="http://www.beatingupwind.com/resources/2008/09/cw-vw-r32-oak-park-900x600-500x333.jpg" alt="2008 Mk 5 R32, Candy White" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Gas mileage isn&#8217;t all that great with it, but with a 3.2L, VR6, 250hp engine you don&#8217;t really expect it to be. I get about 24 mpg on the highway driving &#8220;comfortably fast&#8221;, which isn&#8217;t bad in my book. If I slowed down, I&#8217;d get better gas mileage, but that&#8217;s not why I bought an R32. (Do make sure you have <a href="http://www.beatingupwind.com/2007-12/new-yorkers-upgrade-your-radar-detectors">a good radar detector</a>).</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">One of my favorite things about the car is when Dan drops off something at the front door and then drives away to go park it in the garage. The sound (or should I say growl) of the car is just perfect. I get this big grin on my face and think &#8220;yeah, that&#8217;s <em>my</em> car&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Would I get another R32? Absolutely, in a heartbeat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2008-09/1-year-10000-miles-loving-our-r32/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Downside Of In-Car Navigation Systems</title>
		<link>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2008-05/the-downside-of-in-car-navigation-systems</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2008-05/the-downside-of-in-car-navigation-systems#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 18:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Harper</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[VW]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[maps]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nav systems]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[naviation systems]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[r32]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slicksurface.com/jay-harper/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Navigation systems are great at giving directions, but they fail to give you a sense of where you are. Maps are still wonderful things that give a unique perspective and can accomplish things nav systems can't.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We love the 2008 VW R32 we got back in August. And one of the things we like the most is the nav system. I&#8217;ve read reviews that say it&#8217;s not the best navigation system, but it does the job pretty well. The most important thing is we never argue about directions&#8230;  I was raised in a family where the answer to &#8220;are we there yet&#8221; was to pass you a map and tell you to find where we were, where we were going and calculate the distance and divide by the speed. Dan has improved his navigation skills considerably since we first met, but before the nav system there were still times I&#8217;d have to either grab the map and look at it while I was driving, or pull over to look at the map&#8230; Now with &#8220;Mildred&#8221; (the name we&#8217;ve given our nav system) - none of that is necessary.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d think the nav system is completely wonderful, but I&#8217;m on a trip right now in Chicago and I gotta say there are times I love the nav system, and times I wish I had a map on me. What you lose with navigation systems is a sense of place and location. With a map you get a big picture and see things in relation to each other. Coming into a new city I feel a bit lost using a nav system to get me around. Sure it does a good job, but I don&#8217;t really have a clue where I am, and I miss that. I want to <em>understand</em> the city and the nav system doesn&#8217;t do that for me. I tried Google Maps and that helps a little, but for really getting and understanding a big map with lots of information density will beat Google Maps any day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2008-05/the-downside-of-in-car-navigation-systems/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Yorkers - Upgrade Your Radar Detectors</title>
		<link>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2007-12/new-yorkers-upgrade-your-radar-detectors</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2007-12/new-yorkers-upgrade-your-radar-detectors#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Harper</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NY]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[radar detectors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slicksurface.com/jay-harper/2007-12/new-yorkers-upgrade-your-radar-detectors</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this year I upgraded my Valentine One radar detector - and I&#8217;m so glad I did&#8230; We went up to Toronto for the holidays and every cop I came across was using Ka band radar, which older radar detectors don&#8217;t detect (they typically just do X band and K band). It&#8217;s something I had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this year I upgraded my <a href="http://www.valentine1.com/">Valentine One radar detector </a>- and I&#8217;m <em>so</em> glad I did&#8230; We went up to Toronto for the holidays and every cop I came across was using Ka band radar, which older radar detectors don&#8217;t detect (they typically just do X band and K band). It&#8217;s something I had noticed once back in September or October around the Yonkers/New York City border, but we came across nearly a dozen New York State cops on this trip and in every case it was Ka band radar. Curiously, in some cases there were two bogeys meaning the radar detector is sending out two radar signals, and in one case there was laser on top of that. Sothe NY cops appear to be using a really good radar gun with all the bells and whistles&#8230;</p>
<p>In other words, if you&#8217;re traveling through New York and don&#8217;t have a radar detector that detects Ka band radar - you&#8217;re dead meat if you like to drive as fast as I do&#8230; And I should mention our Valentine One did really well - I&#8217;d recommend it to anyone who&#8217;s looking for a good radar detector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2007-12/new-yorkers-upgrade-your-radar-detectors/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Silver 2000 VW GTI VR6 GLX For Sale</title>
		<link>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2007-08/silver-2000-vw-gti-vr6-glx-for-sale</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2007-08/silver-2000-vw-gti-vr6-glx-for-sale#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Harper</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[VW]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[GTI]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[VR6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.slicksurface.com/jay-harper/blog/wordpress/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our 2000 VW GTI VR6 is for sale - relatively low mileage and a below Blue Book asking price make it a great deal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having recently gotten our new <a href="http://www.slicksurface.com/jay-harper/blog/labels/r32.html">2008 R32</a> it&#8217;s time to sell our 2000 GTI. It&#8217;s been a good car, and if we hadn&#8217;t liked the car we wouldn&#8217;t be getting the R32.</p>
<p>It is pretty much loaded:</p>
<ul>
<li>VR6 (6 cylinder) engine</li>
<li>Leather seats</li>
<li>Climate control (set a temperature and forget it)</li>
<li>Auto dimming rear view mirror</li>
<li>Rain sensing wipers</li>
<li>Front and side airbags</li>
<li>Alloy wheels</li>
<li>Premium sound with CD player</li>
</ul>
<p>It has just over 67,000 miles, has a 5 speed manual transmision, is in great mechanical condition, and has NO RATTLES!</p>
<p>In addition it has mud flaps (to keep the car cleaner), a trailer hitch (you can tow up to 1,500 lbs), and a VW roof rack.</p>
<p>Asking Price: $7,900 (priced below blue book value for a quick sale)</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.slicksurface.com/jay-harper/blog/2007/08/front-side.jpg" alt="2000 GTI Front &amp; Side" height="358" width="540" /></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.slicksurface.com/jay-harper/blog/2007/08/back-side.jpg" alt="2000 GTI Back &amp; Side" height="358" width="540" /></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.slicksurface.com/jay-harper/blog/2007/08/side.jpg" alt="2000 GTI Side" height="358" width="540" /></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.slicksurface.com/jay-harper/blog/2007/08/front.jpg" alt="2000 GTI Front" height="358" width="540" /></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.slicksurface.com/jay-harper/blog/2007/08/odometer.jpg" alt="2000 GTI Odometer" height="358" width="540" /></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.slicksurface.com/jay-harper/blog/2007/08/console.jpg" alt="2000 GTI Console" height="600" width="398" /></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.slicksurface.com/jay-harper/blog/2007/08/frontseat.jpg" alt="2000 GTI Front Seats" height="358" width="540" /></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.slicksurface.com/jay-harper/blog/2007/08/backseat.jpg" alt="2000 GTI Back Seat" height="358" width="540" /></p>
<p>Contact me at <a href="mailto:jay@slicksurface.com?subject=2000%20GTI">jay@slicksurface.com</a> or 917/447-2572 if you&#8217;re interested&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Update: The car has been sold. There was actually a bidding war for the car (nearly everyone who saw it wanted it), and it wound up going for <em>more</em> than the asking price.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2007-08/silver-2000-vw-gti-vr6-glx-for-sale/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our R32 In Canada</title>
		<link>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2007-08/our-r32-in-canada</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2007-08/our-r32-in-canada#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Harper</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[VW]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[canada]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[r32]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.slicksurface.com/jay-harper/blog/wordpress/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We took our new 2008 R32 up to Canada. When we went to the dealer to see if we could get a roof rack the guys at the dealership were completely digging the car since they can't get them up in Canada.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan and I (and the dogs) went to Toronto this past weekend. The craziness started with the Canadian border guard who didn&#8217;t seem to know what a temporary tag was and thought we were driving an unlicensed car. Then a few miles down the road this kid in the back seat of a Lexus SUV had his window rolled down and was pointing and smiling at our car (guess he knew what it was).</p>
<p>But the funniest thing was taking it to the local dealer - <a href="http://www.yorkdalevw.ca/">Yorkdale VW</a>. When we were there over Christmas we saw a black, low-profile roof rack on a GTI which looked a lot better than the standard, chunky thing that VW sells. The dealer here in the US didn&#8217;t know how to get one so I figured the VW dealer in Toronto could get one&#8230;</p>
<p>So I get this guy in the parts department who tries to help me, but he&#8217;s junior and looking at all the wrong pages in the catalogs. So he goes and gets help from the more senior guy who&#8217;s on the phone. He asks what type of car I have and I say an &#8216;08 R32. &#8220;You have a 2008 R32 <span style="font-style: italic">here</span>?&#8221;, &#8220;Yeah&#8230;&#8221; I say&#8230; &#8220;I&#8217;m creaming my pants right now&#8230;&#8221; he responds&#8230;</p>
<p>He comes out to the car to take a look, and while we&#8217;re walking through the shop he tells a couple guys there&#8217;s an &#8216;08 R32 outside&#8230; When we get out there there&#8217;s already someone looking at the car (probably a sales guy or manager). The parts guy and I take a quick look at the car and then head back inside. We look through the computer to see if we can find the low profile roof rack, but can&#8217;t find one - even for an &#8216;07 GTI.</p>
<p>On my way back out to the car I see a bunch of guys looking at it. The manager says, &#8220;I could make a $100 if you stayed here another 15 minutes - just in charging the guys to look at the car.&#8221; Later I think it&#8217;s more like he&#8217;s losing a $100 since they&#8217;re not working&#8230;</p>
<p>I get out the car and there&#8217;s at least 8 guys standing around looking at it. One of them asks me to pop the hood, I do&#8230; They ask how much horsepower it has - one guy thought it had 280 - I say 250. They talk about how VW could fit a 3.6 liter engine in there and make an incredibly fast car. I didn&#8217;t correct them (the 3.6 liter won&#8217;t fit in there). The funny part was how respectful of the car they were - it was like they were afraid to touch it. I wouldn&#8217;t have cared - I even left it unlocked when I went back in with the parts guy figuring some of them would want to look inside, but no one did&#8230;</p>
<p>I barely had enough time to get home and change for Dan&#8217;s grandmother&#8217;s funeral, so I excused myself, closed the hood and left&#8230; Too bad I didn&#8217;t have more time. I really wanted to get some of their dealer plates and a pic of it in front of their showroom so I could do fake &#8220;look, you can get R32s in Canada&#8221; post&#8230; But I didn&#8217;t have the time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2007-08/our-r32-in-canada/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We Finally Got our .:R32</title>
		<link>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2007-08/we-finally-got-our-r32</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2007-08/we-finally-got-our-r32#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 10:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Harper</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[VW]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[r32]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.slicksurface.com/jay-harper/blog/wordpress/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After 6 months of waiting, we finally got our new 2008 R32 - and we love it!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Took possession of our .:R32 last night. The session with our sales guy went really well, after some &#8220;<a href="http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=3368584">drama</a>&#8221; last week when the car came in and we went to look at it.</p>
<p>I think the drama last week was due to a number of factors. First, it was the last day of the month and they wanted to close deals. It seemed like every sales guy (and their dogs) were at the dealership making it a bit of zoo. Second, there was just simple miscommunication (things were on the wrong line of the invoice, etc.) Then there were a few jerks around there, and unfortunately our sales guy shared an office with one. And lastly, they mishandled the financing. Their first offer was for 7.5x% through VW Credit, then they went down to 6.89% through some bank whose name I didn&#8217;t recognize (we wound up getting 6.49% through our bank - Chase).</p>
<p>But he made up for it last night. I&#8217;m thinking he must have read my rant on VWVortex &#8217;cause we went into another office (away from the rude guy), and he was pretty meticulous. It also helped that the place was quieter and calmer&#8230;</p>
<p>We&#8217;re doing a road trip to Toronto this weekend, so we&#8217;ll have pictures of the car early next week&#8230;</p>
<p>Knowing I was just going to stick it in the parking garage for a few days, we drove around last night. I took it pretty easy since I was just getting used to the car and it&#8217;s still in it&#8217;s break in period - not to mention that I&#8217;m a bit petrified of potholes with the 18&#8243; rims&#8230;</p>
<p>All in all, it&#8217;s a pretty slick car. Sounds great, seems really solid (critics would say it feels heavy). The few times I pushed it a little it felt really surefooted. However, while I&#8217;d read someone who said it felt go-cart-like, it didn&#8217;t. The <a href="http://www.slicksurface.com/jay-harper/blog/2007/05/likesdislikes-2003-mini-coooper-s.html">Mini Cooper S</a> felt like a go-cart, the R32 feels too big and substantial for that&#8230; Then again the Mini was too much work to drive and I used to like to get back into the GTI and feel real power and more pampering&#8230; The R32 is like our old GTI, only on steroids&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2007-08/we-finally-got-our-r32/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why We Buy VWs</title>
		<link>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2007-07/why-we-buy-vws</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2007-07/why-we-buy-vws#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Harper</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[VW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.slicksurface.com/jay-harper/blog/wordpress/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've had a number of cars over the years and keep coming back to VW. The cars are fun to drive, reasonably dependable, and VW has one of the best track records in the industry of being gay friendly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve owned just a few of cars over the years:</p>
<ul>
<li>1985-1986: A rusted out yellow 1974 VW Super Beetle I got from my brother-in-law</li>
<li>1986-1988: A copper 1980 Honda Accord LX</li>
<li>1997-1999: A black 1997 VW Golf GL</li>
<li>2000-2007: <a href="http://www.beatingupwind.com/2007-08/silver-2000-vw-gti-vr6-glx-for-sale">A silver VW GTI VR6 GLX</a></li>
<li>2003-2005: A black 1995 VW Passat GLX</li>
<li>2006-2007: <a href="http://www.slicksurface.com/jay-harper/blog/2007/05/likesdislikes-2003-mini-coooper-s.html">A dark silver 2003 Mini Cooper S</a></li>
<li>2007-?: <a href="http://www.slicksurface.com/jay-harper/blog/labels/r32.html">A candy white 2008 VW R32</a> (on order)</li>
</ul>
<p>Of those 7, 5 have been VWs&#8230; Initially it was just &#8217;cause I needed a cheap car and my brother-in-law had one, but now it&#8217;s a lot more than that&#8230;</p>
<p>The 1980 Honda we bought used and it was a nightmare. I was in college in Austin and the thing kept breaking down and it was out of warranty and the repairs were expensive and my parents just didn&#8217;t understand how much of my money the car was eating up&#8230; When someone rear ended me while I was sitting at a red light and the car was totaled I was actually pretty happy not to have the expense of a car.</p>
<p>After that bad experience I wasn&#8217;t exactly running back to Japanese cars even though my parents had always had good luck with Toyotas. The &#8216;97 Golf I bought &#8217;cause I wanted an inexpensive car that looked decent&#8230; I test drove the Golf and a Jeep Wrangler and the Golf was a lot more fun to drive, so I got it. I liked the car well enough that I was pretty sure my next car would be a VW&#8230;</p>
<p>Then Ellen DeGeneres came out on TV. You might not think that it would have an impact on car buying, but for gay men (like me) it definitely did. Ellen&#8217;s coming out was a huge deal. Gay people didn&#8217;t have the visibility back then that they do now and advertisers were scared and started pulling their ads from her show.</p>
<p>So what did VW do? They took the spot right after her character came out and started a new ad campaign with the following ad:</p>
<p align="center"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="350" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5_s5-R_JE4c" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5_s5-R_JE4c" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></p>
<p>The straight world didn&#8217;t really think too much about it, but gay men and lesbians took notice. It wasn&#8217;t enough to get lesbians away from Subaru (who&#8217;s had the lesbian icon Martina Navratilova as their spokesperson), but it solidified gay men&#8217;s love for VW.</p>
<p>Yes, there are bumps along the road, like when a sales guy from Potamkin (the VW dealer in Manhattan) woke me up one morning and proceeded to call me a &#8220;fucking faggot&#8221; and then hang up on me after I told him I didn&#8217;t think much of his dealership because when I tried to buy the Golf from them in &#8216;97 they refused to tell me the details of the financing until <span style="font-style: italic">after</span> I had signed the document to purchase the car (VW customer service had the sales manager at Potamkin call me to apologize for the sales guys comments).</p>
<p>And we&#8217;ve had at least one really frustrating problem with our GTI - a plastic part in the door kept breaking which would drop the window into the door meaning the car wasn&#8217;t wasn&#8217;t secure and couldn&#8217;t be left in anything other than an attended garage. It happened 3 or 4 times and was always hugely inconvenient. They did eventually figure out how to fix it and it hasn&#8217;t been a problem since.</p>
<p>And the Passat we never should have bought&#8230; It had constant problems and they were really expensive to fix. We would have spent less if we had bought a new car. But what I didn&#8217;t appreciate at the time was how hard of a life it had had - which isn&#8217;t something I can hold against VW.</p>
<p>But all in all I love VW. The design of their cars is still pretty good (though not always the best), and I like the level of fit and finish, and I feel like you get a really solid car for the money.</p>
<p>And of course the R32 is just special&#8230; It&#8217;s going to be a blast to own and if anything serious ever happens to it (knock wood), I&#8217;ll be really upset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2007-07/why-we-buy-vws/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our car is on it&#8217;s way&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2007-06/our-car-is-on-its-way</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2007-06/our-car-is-on-its-way#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Harper</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[VW]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[r32]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.slicksurface.com/jay-harper/blog/wordpress/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We got confirmation of when our new R32 is being built, shipped and when it will arrive... We're excited that it's on its way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in February we ordered a new <a href="http://www.slicksurface.com/jay-harper/blog/2007/05/looking-forward-to-our-new-2008-vw-r32.html">VW R32</a>. I just found out from Brendan at <a href="http://www.boardwalkcars.com/volkswagen.html">Boardwalk VW in Redwood City, CA</a> that 1) the car was &#8220;born&#8221; on Dan&#8217;s 40th birthday (6/15/07), and 2) that it will be at the port on 7/6/07. Brendan&#8217;s not our dealer, but he&#8217;s been really generous with all the people on <a href="http://forums.vwvortex.com/zeroforum?id=865">VW Vortex</a> who&#8217;ve pre-ordered their R32s - letting them know the status of their cars. He even found out the VIN number for us&#8230;<span class="posttext"> WVWKC71KX8W021052&#8230;</span></p>
<p>But other people are saying that VW will be holding the cars at port and not releasing them until August since they want to do a proper &#8216;launch&#8217; for the car and not have the cars trickle out one at a time&#8230; While I&#8217;m not happy the car will be sitting in the hot sun for the better part of a month, at least we should get it early in August&#8230; Hopefully we&#8217;ll be able to take it to Canada when we go up to renew Dan&#8217;s visa in mid-August&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatingupwind.com/2007-06/our-car-is-on-its-way/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
